Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

In this article, we would like to discuss related applicability concerns and dive deeper into the benefits Enterprise Test Case Designer could deliver in the Agile environment throughout SDLC.


Table of Contents


First, let’s talk about

...

broader Test Case Designer applicability


While the question posed above is reasonable, Agile vs Waterfall is not the best classification criterium for applying Test Case Designer. The same is true for dividing the apps into GUI, non-GUI, micro services, etc. – it also does not align well with the Enterprise the Test Case Designer strengths.


It is a test design optimization tool which focuses on the early stages of the testing process and then integrates with tools responsible for the subsequent steps, like Ranorex Studio. Speaking about the reduction of effort, the goal of applying Enterprise applying Test Case Designer is to deal with such challenges of manual test creation as prolonged and error-prone scenario selection, gaps in test data coverage, tedious documentation, and excessive maintenance.

...

The methodology Test Case Designer facilitates is based on the research results about the causes of defects in production. Manually written test cases often represent a very fragmented view of the system, focusing on individual inputs while allowing redundancy or omissions in the remainder of the scenario. On the contrary, Enterprise  Test Case Designer provides complete control and traceability for each of the steps in the test case.

...

While the question posed above is reasonable, Agile vs Waterfall is not the best classification criterium for applying Test Case Designer. The same is true for dividing the apps into GUI, non-GUI, micro services, etc. – it also does not align well with the Enterprise the Test Case Designer strengths.


It is a test design optimization tool which focuses on the early stages of the testing process and then integrates with tools responsible for the subsequent steps, like Ranorex Studio. Speaking about the reduction of effort, the goal of applying Enterprise applying Test Case Designer is to deal with such challenges of manual test creation as prolonged and error-prone scenario selection, gaps in test data coverage, tedious documentation, and excessive maintenance.


The methodology Enterprise methodology Test Case Designer facilitates is based on the research results about the causes of defects in production. Manually written test cases often represent a very fragmented view of the system, focusing on individual inputs while allowing redundancy or omissions in the remainder of the scenario. On the contrary, Enterprise  Test Case Designer provides complete control and traceability for each of the steps in the test case.

...

Thus, the key app characteristic is flow variations – in other words, the system overall should contain several decision points and at least 2 steps in the process with multiple options per each. Higher number of those creates numerous possible paths through the system, therefore Enterprise therefore Test Case Designer could be applied to identify the optimal set to test them.

...

Most often, 10+ expected test cases mean it is reasonable to use Enterprise use Test Case Designer for suite generation. Although the application type is not the decisive factor for Enterprise for Test Case Designer applicability, the table below illustrates “happy path” examples for each category.

...

  • Output Format and Standardization

Creating a plan in Enterprise in Test Case Designer may be the fastest route to get the Xray, Gherkin, Java, etc. file with the test cases. Further, you guarantee the consistency of the export format across projects.

...

The current release may have only the minimal information, but if the application keeps growing, you may want to get ahead of the curve and start building the Enterprise the Test Case Designer model in advance.

...

An application with numerous parameters (e.g. >=8) and values may not be a good fit for Enterprise Test Case Designer if the interactions between the elements are heavily limited, leaving only a few possible paths through the system.

...


Test Case Designer Place in Agile

Next, let us focus more on how applying Enterprise Designer Test Case Designer is different in the Agile environment. To have an anchor/benchmark, in the waterfall world, by the time you reach testing, most information is well-defined, so you can start moving through all the traditional Enterprise traditional Test Case Designer six steps sequentially.

...

On the contrary, the iterative nature of the Agile process can be illustrated in the following diagram (Source):

There, Enterprise  Test Case Designer usage flow should ideally start as early as Sprint Planning and requirement definition. SMEs can leverage domain knowledge and application access to more accurately specify the inputs for each requirement. Then the majority of the work is performed during Sprint Execution. Testers would pick up the draft models and expand them to the execution-ready state at the acceptable coverage level. Finally, data tables would be exported to Ranorex Studio or manual scripts would be exported to Xray or automated ones (in the BDD format) passed to the coders for adjustment based on the automation framework.

...

The key challenge is that not every user story may be applicable (from the number of inputs & variations perspective) and, consequently, not every sprint may have sufficient scope. It is quite common that Enterprise that Test Case Designer is used in every 2nd or 3rd sprint, once the testing model has enough elements to justify the combinatorial exploration. And of course, once it comes to regression for each release, Enterprise  Test Case Designer test plans can be easily updated to accommodate the new functionalities.

...

It is also worth noting that sometimes a user story does not look applicable but thinking outside of boundaries will quickly change that assessment. For example, if a user story specifies the ability to log in correctly, it looks like a test with 2 parameters, 1 value each. However, if we look deeper, that requirement means a correct login for different allowed formats for usernames and passwords and an incorrect one for invalid options. Suddenly, thoroughly testing a simple user story can fully leverage Enterprise leverage Test Case Designer capabilities.

...


Test Case Designer as a Catalyst for BDD

At this point, it is also important to keep in mind the general role of the tool in BDD practices (which often accompany the Agile transformation). When we consider common BDD goals, we can think of these 3 as being important:

...

From the requirements standpoint, Gherkin already facilitates more clear understanding of those. On top of that, Enterprise Designer Test Case Designer provides the platform for people with 3 knowledge components (technical, business, and functional) to come together and make sure ambiguities are eliminated and each requirement clearly specifies all the critical input values.

...

Thus, the focus of your decision making should revolve more around the universal benefits of Enterprise Designer Test Case Designer and whether those could improve your status quo.

...